Class Discussion 6/18/07

As a society, I think we avoid making sure that we know more about science and technological issues because they are unsettling. Most of us do not have the knowledge to fully understand the issues and lack the motivation to get the information. If we understood science and technology, then it would very likely revolutionize the way that we think about ourselves and our relationships with others. Apathy is a much easier itinerary. As cheezy as it sounds, Serenity gave an excellent example of this because the Alliance chose to ignore the repercussion of using science/technology in favor of pursuing their goal to bring peace throughout the galaxy. The little pieces of information that are brought to the table are more easily ignored because they would raise questions. If people had known about Miranda, they would likely have rebelled against the Alliance more vehemently.

Similarly, our society avoids talking about the broader impact of new science/technology because it is usually more convenient. For example, research shows cell phones may cause cancer. We do not stop using them because they are a way of life for most of us. Or, there is also research that shows smoking causes cancer. Cities, restaurant, and other organizations are banning smoking because it is convenient for patrons who are allergic or feel strongly in favor of the research. The examples of varying degrees to which people accept science/technology could go on forever, but the point is we usually accept what is convenient or fits with our existing norms and values. A a society we possess little motivation, nor are we motivated by others (very often anyway) to investigate what science/technology is telling us.